It seems like there are two types of Data Governance and Stewardship programs:

  1. Thriving ones, with highly-engaged stakeholders, and
  2. Ones whose futures are in question, since stakeholders and stewards are only sporadically involved or give only weak support to the program.
Engaging Data Stewards and Stakeholders

“How can I make my stewards come to council meetings?” I’m sometimes asked, and my truthful reply is that you can’t – at least not in a sustainable fashion.

But you can convince them to participate. Here’s how.

 

1. Choose the right model for introducing your program.

  • The “Call to Action” model – Participants are asked to address an urgent objective, with the vocal support of leadership.
  • The “Influence the Influencer” model – Data Governance leaders only involve a few influential stakeholders initially, and then grow the program with their help.
  • The “Tom Sawyer” model – Data Governance participants begin by performing data-related tasks which deliver such value (and are so rewarding to perform) that others across the organization ask to take part and share the work.
  • The “Fait Accompli” model – Individuals are guided through a series of activities. Once the work is successfully completed, participants are informed that they have been “doing” governance or stewardship.
  • The “Organic Growth” model – Stewardship activities are positioned as natural extensions to other tasks.

 

2. Demonstrate “what’s in it for them.”

Once potential Data Stewards get through their first council meeting, you should expect them to question whether they should continue to participate. You should have an answer ready for them – and repeat the message at every meeting.

Even participants who believe Data Governance and Stewardship is good to the enterprise will question whether their group needs to participate and whether they personally need to. Sometimes the answer is “no” or “just sometimes.” If this is the case, acknowledge it. On the other hand, if you feel its’ important for someone to participate all the time, you should develop and communicate a strong value proposition for their participation. Some of those arguments will no doubt focus on the benefits to the enterprise, but be sure you also have clear statements of the benefits to them.

 

3. Don’t waste anyone’s time.

Don’t hold meetings just for the sake of having meetings. Remember that your participants may be very in-demand. If you don’t have decisions to make or impacts to consider or other important work, consider canceling your meeting. If you know that only a few members will care about certain topics, then consider forming working groups that meet more often than the full council.

 

4. Remind participants of their accomplishments.

At every meeting, clearly describe what the group is there to accomplish. Remind participants why this can’t be successfully managed any other way. At the end of a meeting, list the day’s accomplishments (decisions made, cross-functional impacts assessed, assumptions turned into actionable knowledge, etc.). Congratulate your participants.

 

5. Publicize your accomplishments.

Make sure that your participants’ peers and superiors lean what you’re doing and what you’re accomplished. Capture metrics, but – even more importantly – build stories. Did your group keep the organization from a mistake? That’s a win. Help a data stakeholder increase revenue? Win. Are you on the critical path for achieving compliance? Value delivered. Share knowledge that would help managers make better decision? Tell them.

Read Next:

Funding Models: Funding Data Governance

The DGI Data Governance Framework addresses funding two ways: Obtaining funding and support is a phase in the Data Governance Life Cycle Funding is part of one of the components of the framework. What type of funding is needed? Data Governance programs need to...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Data Warehouses and Business Intelligence (BI)

This type of program typically comes into existence in conjunction with a specific data warehouse, data mart, or BI tool. These types of efforts require tough data-related decisions, so organizations often implement governance to help make initial decisions, to...

Demonstrating Value

Everything an organization does should tie to one of three universal value drivers. Data Governance efforts MUST tie back to one or more of these drivers. And YOU must communicate how it does.

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Management Alignment

This type of program typically comes into existence when managers find it difficult to make “routine” data-related management decisions because of their potential effect on operations or compliance efforts.Managers may realize they need to come together to make...

Governance and Issue Resolution

One of the three most important jobs of a Data Governance program is to help resolve data-related issues. These may be conflicting data definitions, data usage concerns, or problems with how data is sourced, how it is integrated, how it is protected, or a myriad of...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Privacy, Compliance, Security

This type of program typically comes into existence because of concerns about Data Information Security controls, or compliance. Compliance, in this context, may refer to regulatory compliance, contractual compliance, or compliance with internal requirements.This...

Working with Data Stewards

Approaches to Assigning Data Ownership and Stewardship Organizations can take multiple approaches to assigning Data Owners and Data Stewards for enterprise data. In doing so, they need to consider several factors and answer the following questions.Question #1:  Should...

Choosing Governance Models

It’s important to define the organizational structure of your Data Governance program. But before you can do that you have to define your governance model at a higher level. You need to consider what types of decisions your governance bodies will be called upon to...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Data Quality

This type of program typically comes into existence because of issues around the quality, integrity, or usability of data. It may be sponsored by a Data Quality group or a business team that needs better quality data. (For example: Data Acquisition or  Mergers &...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Architecture, Integration

This type of program typically comes into existence in conjunction with a major system acquisition, development effort, or update that requires new levels of cross-functional decision-making and accountabilities.What other types of groups and initiatives might want...