Everything an organization does should tie to one of three universal value drivers

  1. Increase revenue and value
  2. Manage cost and complexity
  3. Support Risk Management and Compliance efforts, and increase confidence.

Data Governance efforts MUST tie back to one or more of these drivers.  And YOU must communicate how it does.

Demonstrating Value

Here are some of the ways a Data Governance effort can benefit you:

Increase revenue / value of assets

  • Improve the value of the company to those who would acquire it
  • Create “sellable” information products
  • Utilize information assets to make new sales
  • Utilize data to achieve new business capabilities
  • Better understand customers
  • Better understand product (and other) hierarchies

Reduce costs

  • Reduce duplicate data and its costs
  • Reduce duplicate data management processes (example: costs of data modeling, data administration, data quality)
  • Reduce likelihood of errors and associated costs (in software development, report development, information interpretation) due to lack of understanding of data or poor quality data

Support Compliance While Reducing Costs

  • Achieve compliance goals
  • Avoid cost of penalties associated with non-compliance
  • Avoidance of reputational hit (brand impact)
  • Avoid higher audit fees due to lack of confidence in “authoritative data”
  • Reduce management attestation/certification costs
  • Reduce costs of pre-audit testing

Support Impact Analysis

  • Increase ability to do useful impact analysis (by providing authoritative business rules, system of record information, and data lineage metadata)
  • Provide a capability to assess cross-functional impacts of data-related decisions

Help Align Efforts

  • Assist business teams (Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery, Security, and Privacy) to articulate their data-related business rules and requirements to IT, Architecture, and Data Management teams
  • Consider requirements and controls in an integrated fashion
  • Avoid “undoing” work or rendering controls invalid
  • Craft cross-functional accountabilities

Improve Data Repositories

  • Provide accountability and support for improving the quality of data in the repository so it can become an authoritative source of information
  • Reduce likelihood of architectural decisions that limit the organization’s ability to analyze its information
  • Increase ability to find authoritative information quickly

Improve Confidence in Data

  • Increase confidence in data-related decisions
  • Increase ability to make timely data-related decisions (this can affect time-to-market for projects and applications)
  • Increase confidence in data appearing in financial and management reports
  • Increase confidence in data strategy by providing a cross-functional team to weigh in on key decisions

Read Next:

Assigning Data Ownership

One of the tenets of Data Governance is that enterprise data doesn’t “belong” to individuals. It is an asset that belongs to the enterprise. Still, it needs to be managed…

Focus Areas for Data Governance

All Data Governance programs are not alike. Quite the contrary: programs can use the same framework, employ the same processes, and still appear very different. Why is this? It’s because of what the organization is trying to make decisions about or enforce rules for....

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Policy, Standards, Strategy

This type of program typically comes into existence because some group within the organization needs support from a cross-functional leadership body. For example, companies moving from silo development to enterprise systems may find their application development teams...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Data Warehouses and Business Intelligence (BI)

This type of program typically comes into existence in conjunction with a specific data warehouse, data mart, or BI tool. These types of efforts require tough data-related decisions, so organizations often implement governance to help make initial decisions, to...

Focus Areas for Data Governance: Privacy, Compliance, Security

This type of program typically comes into existence because of concerns about Data Information Security controls, or compliance. Compliance, in this context, may refer to regulatory compliance, contractual compliance, or compliance with internal requirements.This...

Implementing Change Management

Most organizations have string change management – or at least change control – mechanisms for technology. They usually have change management for software applications. They have change management for websites. And yet, many organizations do not practice structured...

Funding Models: Funding Data Governance

The DGI Data Governance Framework addresses funding two ways: Obtaining funding and support is a phase in the Data Governance Life Cycle Funding is part of one of the components of the framework. What type of funding is needed? Data Governance programs need to...

Governance and Decision-Making

Remember our (long) definition for Data Governance? “Data Governance is a system of decision rights and accountabilities for information-related processes, executed according to agreed-upon models which describe who can take what actions with what information, and...

Choosing Governance Models

It’s important to define the organizational structure of your Data Governance program. But before you can do that you have to define your governance model at a higher level. You need to consider what types of decisions your governance bodies will be called upon to...

Defining Organizational Structures

There is no single “right” way to organize Data Governance and Stewardship. Some organizations have distinct Data Governance programs. Others embed Data Governance activities into Data Quality or Master Data Management programs.